Home / Knowledge Base / Rod anchors vs. strand anchors: applications and differences explained
Written by
Robert Jansen
Technical Sales Manager
Written by
9 April 2026
Category
Product, R&D
Bar anchors and strand anchors are both used for ground anchoring, but differ in construction and load-bearing capacity. In this article, we will explain how both systems work and when to choose a ground anchor or a strand anchor.
In construction projects where stability under tensile load is essential, ground anchoring plays an important role. This includes situations such as cofferdams, sheet piles, or foundations, where forces from the structure need to be transferred to the subsoil. Within this field, various types of anchors are used, including bar anchors and strand anchors. Although these systems are similar, they differ in their operation and scope of application. The correct choice depends heavily on factors such as load, soil structure, and the desired lifespan of the construction.
An ground anchor is a structural element used to transfer tensile forces from a building into the surrounding soil layers. This keeps a structure stable and prevents displacement. In practice, a ground anchor is installed by drilling into the ground, after which the anchor is inserted and secured with grout, a cement-like mixture that creates a strong connection with the soil. For this reason, it is also often referred to as a grout anchor, bored anchor, or tension anchor.
Ground anchors are widely used in combination with sheet piles, quay walls, and foundations. They also offer an effective solution for applications in concrete structures, such as a ground anchor in concrete.
A strand anchor is a specific variant within ground anchoring and is distinguished by its construction. Instead of a single solid anchor rod, a strand anchor consists of multiple steel strands that are tensioned together. Due to this construction, a strand anchor can withstand significantly higher tensile forces than a standard ground anchor. This makes the system particularly suitable for applications where heavy loads occur or where long-term, permanent anchoring is required. Its operation is similar to that of a ground anchor but offers greater capacity and control in critical structures. Furthermore, a strand anchor comes on a reel, requiring less space to insert the anchor into the borehole.
Although both bar anchors and strand anchors are used for ground anchoring, they differ distinctly in construction and application. A bar anchor consists of a single anchor bar and is suitable for a wide range of medium-load projects. A strand anchor is constructed from multiple high-grade steel strands and is used when higher tensile forces and long-term stability are required. This makes the installation more complex, but also more reliable for heavy constructions.
The choice between a bar anchor and a strand anchor is determined by the project's requirements. For projects with average loads and a relatively short lead time, a ground anchor often suffices as an efficient solution. When the load increases or when the structure needs to remain stable long-term, a strand anchor is more frequently chosen. This is particularly true for deep excavation support and infrastructure works.
This checklist helps you make the right choice:
| Comparison Property |
Rod anchor Single ground anchor |
Strand anchor Pre-stressed multi-strand system |
|---|---|---|
| Structure | Single anchor rod | Multiple pre-stressed steel strands |
| Load capacity (indicative) | 150 kN – 3,500 kN | 400 kN – 4,600+ kN |
| Capacity per element | Fully dependent on rod diameter | 200 kN per strand (combinable) |
| Application | Standard coffer dams, sheet pilings, foundations | Deep construction pits, heavy infrastructure, permanent structures. Limited space (strands on a reel). |
| Installation complexity | Relatively simple | More complex (scaling up, pre-stressing, system construction) |
| Control and monitoring | Limited | High control (pre-tensioning per strand) |
| Lifespan | Temporary to semi-permanent | Semi-permanent to permanent |
| Corrosion protection | Foundation to extensive | Multiple system level (e.g. PL2 / PL3) |
| Application of risk | Low to medium risks | High risks / inner-city situations |
| Soil sensitivity | Suitable for stable soil | Suitable for complex / variable soil |
| Construction pit workspace | Limited advantage over alternatives | More workspace (no stamping required) |
| Typical choice | Quick and efficient | Certainty and capacity |
A comparison on paper is one thing, making the right choice for a specific project is another. In practice, five factors are weighed: traction, lifespan, safety, ground conditions, and the balance between speed and certainty. The questions below will help to structure that consideration.
The required pulling force often determines the type of anchor. Bar anchors are typically used for loads of approximately 150 kN to 3,500 kN. Strand anchors accommodate higher forces: from 400 kN to 4,600+ kN, by combining multiple steel strands of approximately 200 kN each.
With moderate loads, such as standard Construction pits of Dam anchoring, A ground anchor suffices as an efficient solution. When forces increase, for example in deep excavations or heavy infrastructural constructions, a strand anchor offers more certainty. Furthermore, the capacity per strand is modular: by adjusting the number of strands, you can precisely match the system to the calculated load.
For temporary applications lasting up to 7 years, ground anchors are often chosen because they are quicker to install and remain flexible in their use. For permanent structures with a lifespan of up to 100 years, such as quay walls, tunnel sections, or railway infrastructure, a strand anchor offers greater certainty through system-level corrosion protection.
At Deepro, that difference has been implemented in the system itself, the PL0 en PL1+ are designed for temporary anchoring for two and seven years respectively. The PL2 offers permanent protection for up to 100 years, with two independent protective layers over the entire anchor length. The PL3 adds electrical insulation to it, essential for projects where stray currents are a factor, such as along or under the track.
For projects with limited risks and a relatively standard execution situation, a bar anchor is often a suitable solution. However, in urban environments, complex construction sites, or constructions where the consequences of movement or deformation are significant, a strand anchor is more likely to be the preferred choice. This type of anchor offers more control, higher capacity, and thus extra security in situations where a larger safety margin is required.
In stable ground conditions, a bar anchor can function perfectly, whereas in more complex or unpredictable soil conditions, a strand anchor offers greater control and reliability. Therefore, especially in urban projects or situations where risks are higher, a solution with a greater safety margin is often chosen.
While a bar anchor excels in efficiency and broad applicability, a strand anchor offers the capacity and durability required for heavier and longer-term projects.
In practice, the higher the load and the longer the service life, the greater the likelihood that a strand anchor is the correct solution.
In practice, for a standard excavation pit in sandy soil with a limited excavation depth and relatively low loads, ground anchors are often chosen. This type of anchor is quick to install and offers sufficient capacity for medium-duty applications.
For an urban project with a deep excavation pit, high ground and water pressure, and limited space for deformation, the choice is different. In such situations, strand anchors are often chosen. Due to their higher load capacity (up to 4,600 kN) and the possibility to combine multiple strands and tension them individually, more control over the behaviour of the structure is achieved.
In addition, a strand anchor offers greater security for permanent applications, such as quay walls or infra-structureel working, where lifespan and reliability are essential.
These sorts of practical choices are often seen back in applications such as Sea walls, Grafting en Construction pits.
When choosing an anchoring system, standards and certifications play an important role. It is not only the capacity, but above all the reliability and lifespan of the system that must be demonstrable.
For bar anchors and strand anchors, different standards and assessment frameworks apply in Europe. The most important ones are:
A significant difference lies in the system-level certification. Whereas traditional bar anchors are often assessed per component, strand anchors are tested and certified as a complete system. This means that all parts (strand, anchor head, sheathing, grout, and seals) are evaluated together for performance, durability, and safety.
Just as is also the case within standardisation, an anchor rarely fails due to one component, but rather due to the weakest link in the whole. It is precisely for this reason that system-level certification offers additional certainty, particularly for permanent and heavily loaded structures.
The main difference lies in their construction: a rod anchor consists of a single bar, while a strand anchor contains multiple steel strands, allowing it to withstand higher forces.
Bar anchors are used in constructions where medium-duty tensile forces need to be absorbed, such as in sheet piling, excavation pits, and foundations. They are particularly suitable for projects with a relatively limited excavation depth and standard soil conditions. Due to their simple structure and efficient installation, ground anchors are often a cost-effective solution.
In situations where the load increases or higher demands are placed on durability and deformation, a strand anchor can be a better alternative. The choice ultimately depends on factors such as load, soil structure, and project duration.
A ground anchor is another term for a rod anchor and is a type of ground anchoring system where the anchoring in the soil is achieved.
Grout anchors are widely used in situations where a reliable and durable connection to the ground is required. In practice, terms such as grout anchor, drill anchor and ground anchor are often used interchangeably, depending on the execution method.
Not always, but for high tensile forces or permanent structures, strand anchors often offer more security.
Download the file
To receive the file, you need to leave an email address.